Local business? Support local news on CollegeStation.news

Back to College Station

Texas A&M team finds cheaper sugar compound works in experimental glucose sensor

Texas A&M researchers report that a glucose-sensing material costing about one-tenth as much as the one used before performed comparably in lab tests of an injectable sensor still at the proof-of-concept stage.

Reese Fenn· AI-assisted, edited by Jake Team

November 3, 20262 min read

biomedical innovation - illustration, Jake Team LLC

Biomedical engineers at Texas A&M University say they have cut the cost of one key ingredient in an experimental injectable glucose sensor to about a tenth of what it was, without losing performance in laboratory testing, according to a report from the university's communications office published Tuesday.

The findings appear in a study in the journal ACS Measurement Science Au. The researchers stress that the device is a proof of concept, not a product, and still requires further work and testing before any clinical use.

How the sensor works

Many glucose monitors depend on enzymes; this design does not. It reads glucose through near-infrared fluorescence: a protein called concanavalin A, or ConA, holds a glowing sugar compound, and as glucose levels climb, glucose molecules push that compound off the protein's binding sites. The shift in the light signal tells the sensor how much glucose is present, the university said.

Earlier versions of the technology used a compound called α-mannopentaose. After testing several options, the team found that β-mannopentaose, a far cheaper material, gave similar results, including in artificial interstitial fluid made to imitate conditions under the skin, according to the report.

The sensing chemistry is packed into a small hydrogel meant to be injected and rest beneath the skin, letting glucose pass through while holding the sensing materials in place. In a seven-day test, over 94% of the sensing assay stayed inside the gel, the university said.

Cost as the goal

"The surprising part was how closely the lower-cost material matched the performance of the more expensive alternative," said Dr. Sayantan Tripathy, the study's lead author, who works in the university's Optical and Bio-Sensing Laboratory as an assistant research scientist.

Dr. Gérard L. Coté, who led the study and teaches biomedical engineering, said the group's long-term aim is an injectable sensor that is reliable and affordable, "particularly for people in under-resourced communities and those without adequate insurance coverage." Co-author Dr. Melissa Grunlan, who holds professorships in both biomedical engineering and chemistry, said that when new medical technology is expensive, "access can be limited."

The team plans to keep refining the platform and test other components that could improve how well and how long the sensor works. Other authors were Dr. Carolina Martinez, Anthony Dongchau and Samyucktha Ganesapandian, all of Texas A&M. Funding came from the National Science Foundation's Engineering Research Center for Precise Advanced Technologies and Health Systems for Under-resourced Populations.

Sources

stories.tamu.edu

Share

Reese Fenn· AI-assisted, edited by Jake Team

Reese Fenn writes about community life, schools, public safety, and local events in College Station.

Related Stories

More in Texas